America Is Sleepwalking Into AI Propaganda Hell
The Massie collapse isn’t an anomaly. It’s a preview of what modern politics is becoming. And we need to prepare for it.
Andrew Schultz said something this week that honestly explains the entire problem with modern American politics better than most elected officials ever could:
By ousting Thomas Massie in the Kentucky Senate primary, Republican voters appeared to validate one of the most common stereotypes coastal elites hold about Southern Republican voters: that they are easily persuaded to vote against their own interests.
And before conservatives get angry about that, listen to what he actually meant.
Today’s rant is sponsored by Incogni.
Someone just looked you up. You had no idea.
A researcher at Consumer Reports—someone whose job is online safety—typed her own name into a search engine. Her home address, age, and phone number were sitting there, on data broker sites she’d never heard of. No hack. No breach. Just her name in a search box.
Yours is there too. Right now. Available to an ex, a stranger, anyone who decides they want to find you.
That's why my team and I use Incogni. It’s one of those things you don’t realize you need until you see how much of your life is just…publicly available online.
Schulz’ comment wasn’t about mocking working-class people or rural voters or pretending Democrats are morally or intellectually superior. It was about manipulation.
Kentucky voters didn’t suddenly become less intelligent than voters anywhere else. They were targeted by one of the most sophisticated political influence operations ever deployed in a congressional race. Tens of millions of dollars were spent flooding voters with AI-generated garbage, fake outrage, and loyalty tests until they turned on one of the few Republicans in Congress who actually believe in something.
And honestly, this should terrify everybody; regardless of what party you side with.
Because the Thomas Massie situation isn’t really about Thomas Massie. It’s the first glimpse of what politics looks like when AI-powered propaganda becomes more powerful than ideology itself.
We’re rapidly entering an era where billionaires, super PACs, influencers, algorithms, and synthetic media can manufacture reality for voters — and punish anyone who refuses to participate in or pushes back against it.
That’s the real story here.
Let me be clear: Massie is not a liberal. He’s not some secret Democrat. He’s a conservative libertarian from Kentucky who voted with Republicans the overwhelming majority of the time. Full stop.
But that is exactly what makes this story so important: Massie didn’t change. The rules changed. The moment he criticized Trump on Iran, government spending, and the Epstein files, the machine turned on him instantly.
And the way they destroyed him says everything about what politics is becoming.
Outside groups dumped roughly $35 million into the Kentucky Congressional race while flooding voters with AI-generated attack ads portraying Massie in fake sexual scenarios with AOC and Ilhan Omar.
Think about how insane that is for a second.
We are now entering an era where political campaigns can generate completely fabricated imagery at scale, push it through partisan media ecosystems, microtarget emotionally vulnerable voters, and then hide behind shell PACs with names designed to sound grassroots and local.
And millions of people will believe it.
That’s psychological warfare with better software operating in a dysfunctional democracy. But the most terrifying part of all of this it that it worked. That’s the lesson every campaign consultant, billionaire donor, PAC strategist, and political operative just learned.
And what’s wild is that even Schultz — somebody who spent years inside the broader anti-establishment media ecosystem, who helped bolster Trump — seems genuinely disturbed by how openly manipulative this has become. He basically says Kentucky voters got conned by a machine designed to prey on emotion instead of reality.
Honestly, I think a lot of people across the political spectrum know that feeling now.
Because whether it’s Fox News, TikTok politics, left-wing influencer culture, MAGA podcasts, partisan YouTube channels, or algorithmic outrage farming, everybody is being pushed into increasingly artificial versions of reality where nuance and critical thinking disappear completely.
Massie voted against Republican spending bills because he believed they would increase the country’s debt (which they do—the “Big Beautiful Budget” blew a multi-trillion-dollar hole in the deficit) and somehow that reasoning became “Massie sides with AOC.” And that machine-generated narrative spread like wildfire across social media.
The goal wasn’t to convince voters that Massie was wrong. The goal was to convince them that he was disloyal. And that’s a completely different kind of politics. One is about ideas. The other is about blind obedience where questioning war becomes disloyalty and where questioning Trump becomes treason.
That’s the part I think people are underestimating.
The modern Republican Party is no longer really organized around conservative ideology. It’s organized around loyalty to Trump and the media ecosystem surrounding him. The second somebody deviates from that ecosystem — even slightly — they become disposable regardless of their actual record.
And Democrats should be careful before they laugh too hard about this because the same incentives exist everywhere now. It affects the left just as much of the right.
The internet rewards emotional manipulation more than truth. Outrage spreads faster than complexity. Algorithms reward certainty, anger, humiliation, and fear because those emotions keep people online longer.
That’s why politics increasingly feels like professional wrestling mixed with behavioral psychology.
And AI is about to make all of it exponentially worse.
Because most people are not equipped to navigate a world where fake images, fake audio, fake video, and synthetic narratives become indistinguishable from reality. Especially older voters who already struggle with basic internet misinformation.
This isn’t meant to be an insult. It’s simply true.
And honestly, I think the generational divide Schultz talks about is real. Younger voters grew up understanding that the internet manipulates you. Older generations often still consume media as if the traditional gatekeepers (Fox, CNN, etc.) are fundamentally trustworthy.
Except now the gatekeepers are influencers, PACs, billionaire and corporate-owned media conglomerates, anonymous meme accounts, and AI-generated content farms.
That’s a dangerous combination.
And underneath all of this is an even bigger problem that nobody in power seems interested in fixing: the collapse of trust in the institutions that are supposed to help us distinguish truth from fiction.
People don’t trust the press.
They don’t trust Congress.
They don’t trust universities.
They don’t trust the justice system.
And increasingly, they don’t trust reality itself.
That vacuum creates the perfect environment for political cults, conspiracy theories, and authoritarian personalities who promise certainty in an age where everything feels unstable.
That’s why this Massie story matters even if you disagree with him politically.
Because once a political system starts rewarding absolute loyalty over independent thought, it inevitably becomes more extreme, more dishonest, and more disconnected from reality over time.
And AI-driven propaganda is only going to accelerate that collapse.
The scary part is that this is probably still the early version.
Right now the fake images are sloppy enough that people can still sometimes tell they’re fake. Give it a few more years and they may become near indistinguishable. Eventually voters won’t be able to distinguish reality from fabrication at all unless they actively spend time verifying information themselves.
Most people won’t do that.
They’ll just believe whatever confirms their emotional biases the fastest. And the algorithms in our feeds know that.
And whichever political movement learns to weaponize that environment most effectively is probably going to dominate the next era of American politics.
Not because they’re right or because they have better ideas, but because they understand modern media better than everybody else.
That’s the future we’re walking into right now.
And honestly, I don’t think the country is prepared for it.
The real lesson of the Massie story isn’t what happened to Thomas Massie. It’s that millions of dollars, AI-generated propaganda, and a loyalty-driven media machine were able to convince voters that one of the most conservative members of Congress was somehow their enemy. If that can happen to him, it can happen to anyone. And once politics becomes a competition to manufacture reality instead of debate reality, democracy stops being a contest of ideas and becomes a contest of influence.
P.S. Being online means being tracked. Incogni helps you take back control.
The biggest problem you more or less hint at.
To me, the bigger problem than the lack of critical thinking is the acceptance that the lack of critical thinking is a perfectly acceptable way to deal with reality, AND the positive joy with which THEY* greet the lack of critical thinking because it makes them feel big. Because I see this embiggening to be one of the crucial social psychological problems facing the 21st-century. There are billions of people around me, forces that are beyond my ability to understand, let alone control, and I need to feel like I am something more than I am. And I’m too fucking lazy and entitled to accomplish it on my own, so I need to be embiggened by artificial means.
Senator Mike Lee of Utah is someone that makes Massey look like a flaming liberal. Today, he breathlessly announced that James Talerico would happily take your children and literally sacrifice them to Moloch. There is absolutely zero ambiguity and what he had to say. In a sane world, he would be censured by the Senate. His church would castigate him for reviling and slandering people. the people of Utah would demand his resignation. And he would be ashamed if he had the slightest bit of decency, but with a comment like that, decency long ago left the building.
Instead, we get crickets.
He’s not saying this because he’s hoping to convince anybody but his rabid base. He would be even stupider than he appears to be if he actually thought that he could. The intention is to inflame the terminally stupid, the exorbitantly fearful, the spiritually bankrupt. But that is the whole methodology of the demagogue— to make himself as stupid as the people that listen to him so that they will think that they are as smart and successful as he is.
That is Lee. That is Trump. That is every single religious huckster out there.
*THEY- a global conspiracy company
So scary! That's why I trust you, Mike, and Rick Wilson to steer me toward the truth!