38 Comments
User's avatar
Robert C Miller's avatar

Ditto! Europe really need not fire a single shot! All they need to do is: drop U.S securities and tank the U.S dollar! Meanwhile, Trump is clueless about the function of: The IMF! Moreover, he wanted to shut down both: IMF/WTO during Trump 1.0! P.S. The thing that worries me is: Trump was really bad during Trump 1.0, AND WAY BEFORE HE HAD FULL BLOWN DEMENTIA! And; just like Venezuela, no body thought he would attack and kidnap Maduro/wife! Likewise, there are folks that think he won’t attack, “Greenland.” Just like the oil in Venezuela, Greenland has raw materials and Peter Thiel/Drayden Brown want those minerals! Y’all, better check out substack bro: Malcolm Nance and his take on “The 11th airborne out of Alaska!!

timebinder's avatar

URGENT HELP 🚨

Please help Ukraine with Generators!!

They are living in -20C Freezing 🥶 conditions with no power, as Putin has bombarded their utilities

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/anita-kennedy-75948b7_people-in-ukraine-need-generators-here-is-activity-7417935366869053440-NL-7?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAAADpQYkBay5Pr615d-EU0vYlDUag8Z7lHVU

I'm in Kyiv. The energy crisis here is an emergency

Join my fundraiser to buy batteries and warm clothes for kids

ANASTASIIA LAPATINA

https://open.substack.com/pub/yoursukrainian/p/im-in-kyiv-the-energy-crisis-here?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=55nkvn

A conversation with Regan Boychuk, a Canadian who understands power, who has it and who should

https://youtu.be/s2NI-f1hP4Q?si=jQ0YKUILZHsWKb8B

Patrick/Regan discuss about the Epstein case/its implications for global trade/politics, exploring historical connections between organized crime/mainstream economies.

timebinder's avatar

Murder, Kidnapping, and Invasion: The Legal Case Against Trump's Venezuela Campaign / Trump/Hegseth,. serial killers, 115+ people. Due Process Denied: The Legal Case Against Extrajudicial Killing in Venezuela Waters

https://pc93.substack.com/p/due-process-denied-the-legal-case?r=55nkvn

Mason Frichette's avatar

There are reports out now that internal communications have stated that ICE agents don't need judicial warrant to violently or without permission break into a home. Yo, folks, if that is true then the 4th Amendment has been repealed. And it's worse than that. The agents are to be verbally informed of this permission, but no paper trail will be allowed to exist. This makes me think of John Yoo's torture memos giving the US permission to torture detainees. Oh, I'm sorry, did I say "torture." I meant "enhanced interrogation."

PG's avatar

The 4th Amendment has not been repealed. These bums want to PRETEND that it doesn't apply to them, and defy anyone to stop them. To the courthouse we go then. Anyone who's 4th Amendment rights are violated should sue, and they should win.

Mason Frichette's avatar

I agree that they should win and if we had a competent, uncorrupted SCOTUS they would, but who knows what the Shameful Six will do. Some things should be so clear cut that we could rest assured that the SCOTUS would do the right thing, But that should have been the case for officials who were protected by law from being fired except for specific causes. What did the SCOTUS clowns do? They ignored the law and told Trump to be their guest in firing theoretically protected officials. They are using the very unconstitutional Unitary Executive theory to rewrite parts of the Constitution and ignore laws passed by Congress. This is just one reason why former conservative appeals court judge Michael Luttig said the his "friend" Chief Justice Roberts is "leading this country down the path of lawlessness." Not what should be expected of a nation's top court.

The funny (totally unfunny) thing is that the SCOTUS can "repeal" the 4th Amencment by simply ignoring it and coming up with bogus reasons why it doesn't apply or something is an exception. At various times the justices will claim that originalism or textualism require that they rule a certain way. But in making their decision they ignore the theoretical way in which one or the other tool is used. Textualism, for example, requires that the justices apply the Constitution in a way that requires them to follow the explicit meaning of the text as it was written down in the 1700s. Antonin Scalia a devotee of texualism essentially ignored the plain wording of the 2nd Amendment when he wrote the D.C. v. Heller gun decision in which, despite the wording regarding militias, he found a personal right to "keep and bear arms" in the complete absence of any connection to a militia. Both originalism and textualism often require a generous application of hypocrisy that conveniently gets the justices the outcomes their personal agendas prefer.

PG's avatar

Actually....no.

I'm well aware of the games that the GOP appointees on the SCOTUS are trying to play. We both know they've gone "heads I win, tails you lose" on more obscure regulations and voting laws.

But the 4th amendment is a pretty big one. I say put it out there and let them say "No, it doesn't count for ICE", which would be the most blatant example of upending the law for one side. If that's what they think, then put them on the record so everyone can see they're frauds. Or watch them actually stick to the law and have to sock it to their side.

And yes, "textualism" is a bunch of nonsense that has been used to end up with their preferred result.

Reformed Republican's avatar

Thank you General for your prior years of and for everything you are doing now in your continuing fight for our country! It has never been more desperately needed.

Steven Jonas's avatar

Well, Trump has, so far, one major achievement resulting from his threat to use military force to "take" Greenland. He has united most of the major members of the European Union (plus Canada) against him, the initiative, and the current govt. of the United States. (Orban surely won't sign on, and, to my knowledge, we have not heard yet from Italy, Spain and Portugal.) They will move quickly to set up a new international economic system that excludes the United States. Further, you can bet your bottom dollar that the EU defense depts. have started crash research programs for upgrading the Rafaele, SAAB, and Eurojet fighter aircraft so that they can eventually eliminate their current dependence on the U.S. F-35's.

timebinder's avatar

The Greenlandic peoples are not seals to be clubbed! When "Pragmatism" Becomes Pathology: Trump's Anti-Conscious Time-Binding Greenland/Ukraine/Civilized World Threat

https://pc93.substack.com/p/when-pragmatism-becomes-pathology?r=55nkvn

Leslie Kramer's avatar

While Hitler was "legally " elected- still not so sure about how legal his election really was - there was simultaneously a constant flood of centuries-old propaganda of dehumanizing and blaming "others" for Germany's self-manufactured problems. This included and was not limited to anyone not considered "the master race." Humans physically and cognitively different, Jews, Romas, regime resisters, and others. The typical German had no problem sending my family off to Auschwitz, Buchenwald, and other death locations. No problem eliminating-slaughtering people who were "less than perfect". Scarily, since societies seem to need scapegoats. Fascist fronts existed and thrived in other places, too, members more than willing to participate. Same as today. I'm thinking- hoping- that your guest knows and understands the vital, historical role this bigotry plays in "othering" populations that make up societies.

Mason Frichette's avatar

Well, since Trump said on Wednesday that he would not take Greenland (or Iceland if he sends the troops to the wrong country) by force, it seems unlikely that he will send troops to Greenland now.

Of course, Trump is such an idiot and so totally batshit crazy that who knows what he will do.

Edward F Dijeau's avatar

What people do not understand, the most powerful branch of our government resides in Arlington Virgina at the Pentagon. The Supreme court could call upon the Pentagon to reign in unlawful actions of the "Commander in Chief". The pentagon can also disobey an illegal order coming from the White House. The Uniform Code of Military Justice covers every serving person in the American Military all the way up to the Commander in Chief. The second amendment of our constitution was aimed at "organized militia's" being armed enough to push back on enemies foreign and domestic including a dictator. The UCMJ could be used if the President violates the constitution in issuing orders that would be considered as illegal.

Mary McAvoy's avatar

thanks to both of you for your thoughts and for giving us hope. you both sounded like the American people of my parents' generation - WWII. We will get through this by standing shoulder to shoulder in unity.

Joan MacLeod's avatar

Thanks for this great show today Mike and Major General Randy Manner.

Cathi Culver's avatar

Excellent to know prior members of the military do not support what Trump is doing. I am one of those. There were a lot of veterans in the Jan 6th riot on Capital Hill, which to me, is unfathomable. I'm so thankful I'm not serving now. I'd have to resign. I absolutely could not and would not obey the orders of this president. I think he's a narcissistic wacko.

Chrisanne Nelson's avatar

Retired Major General Randy Manner, makes sense to me! Thanks, Mike for having him on!

Marcia Dunbar's avatar

Much respect General

timebinder's avatar

Krasnov Trumputler Trumputin’s Axis of Evil Ukraine / Authoritarian Fascist Global Domination Strategy

https://pc93.substack.com/p/meeting-of-the-valdai-discussion?r=55nkvn